Shop Reviews

US imposes new tariffs over forced labour

By Lauren Anderson
·
Share:
US imposes new tariffs over forced labour - us tariffs
US imposes new tariffs over forced labour

The United States has imposed new tariffs ranging from 10% to 12.5% on imports from 60 trading partners. The action replaces a previous 10% global tariff set to expire on July 24.

The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) stated the tariffs target nearly all U.S. imports—99.4%—while exempting oil, gas, fertilizers, and selected foods. The measure was enacted under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, a provision used to address unfair trade practices.

Enforcement gaps trigger tariff differences

According to a USTR Fact Sheet, 54 economies, including the UK, Australia, Brazil, China, India, Japan, and the European Union, have not established or effectively enforced bans on imported goods made with forced labour. An additional six economies—Canada, Ecuador, the European Union, Indonesia, Mexico, and Pakistan—were cited for failing to enforce such bans.

Nations that have committed to adopting and enforcing these prohibitions face a 10% tariff, while those that have not will see tariffs set at 12.5%.

Related: Nike to simplify China online operations

Ambassador Jamieson Greer said: “President Trump recognises that decades of moral suasion have not eradicated forced labour from global supply chains. The US has had a forced labour import ban for nearly a century, and rigorously enforces it; it’s well past time for our trading partners to do the same.

“Today’s action will begin to correct what is both a human rights abuse and distortive trade practice to improve the welfare of workers everywhere. I am encouraged by the trading partners who have moved quickly to adopt forced labour import prohibitions, and look forward to ensuring their effective enforcement.”

The decision followed a public consultation process, with USTR citing more than 2,100 public comments and two rounds of public hearings as part of its investigative process.

Trade partners react

Australia and Brazil described the measures as unjustified and stated intentions to seek their removal. Norway also contested the move, saying there was “no basis” for the new tariffs. The Canadian Prime Minister vowed to defend domestic industries after the US enacted a 50% tariff on a range of Canadian goods, including apparel and textiles.

Not all responses were critical. Sri Lanka’s apparel industry, represented by the Joint Apparel Association Forum (JAAF), said it was pleased to be in the list of countries with the 10% tariffs instead of 12.5%.

Related: How widely available are Lab created diamonds in the uk

JAAF’s statement said, “Parity of tariffs is something JAAF has consistently and actively lobbied for, and we are extremely appreciative of the efforts of His Excellency President Anura Kumara Dissanayake and the Government of Sri Lanka in ensuring that strong representations were made to the US authorities to secure this outcome.

“Sri Lanka’s apparel industry competes in a crowded field, and even a 2.5 percentage point difference in tariff treatment can be the difference between winning and losing an order to a rival sourcing destination. Securing parity with Bangladesh, Pakistan, India, and Cambodia protects the competitiveness of an industry that remains the country’s largest export earner and a major source of employment, particularly for women, across the country.

“JAAF recognises that this result did not happen by chance. It reflects sustained, coordinated engagement between industry and government at every level, from the submissions made to USTR to the direct representations carried out in Washington. We view this as a strong example of what can be achieved when the private sector and government work in close partnership on issues that directly affect Sri Lanka’s export competitiveness.”

The new tariffs are now in effect.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *